The corporate creative model is broken. Here is why.

A company that wants to produce a campaign today has more resources than ever. Thousands of freelancers available in a few clicks, agencies for every budget, tools that automate half the tasks, and AI that generates a first draft in a few seconds.
And yet, producing remains slow, expensive and tiring. This paradox deserves a closer look, because it reveals where the problem really lies.
The real path of a creative project
Let's look at what a campaign actually looks like in most small and mid-sized companies. It starts in Notion, continues in Slack, passes through a Drive, goes through WeTransfer, gets discussed on WhatsApp, involves a freelancer found on a marketplace, gets designed in Figma, gets approved as a PDF, gets exchanged by email, gets signed, gets invoiced, and often ends with a message that has become a classic: "can you resend me V12?"
Finance would never accept working this way. Neither would sales. Human resources even less. But creative work has lived like this for twenty years, and everyone has ended up finding it normal.
Why each existing building block fails on its own
The market offers three main answers today, and each hits the same limit.
| Model | What it brings | Where it gets stuck |
|---|---|---|
| Agency | Framing, expertise, a team | High cost, human dependency, weak continuity |
| Freelancers | Flexibility, price, specialists | Constant sourcing, variable quality, no orchestration |
| Software | Task automation | Solves neither judgment, nor direction, nor coherence |
The agency executes but does not build lasting capability inside your company. Freelancers multiply the options but leave you to manage coordination. Software handles repetitive tasks but stays silent on the decisions that really matter.
So the market sells components. Almost no one sells a complete capability.
The real problem is not resources
This is where the whole argument plays out. Companies do not lack talent, tools or ideas. They lack a system able to turn an intention into execution.
The more a company creates, the lower the cost of production, notably thanks to AI. But the cost of organization explodes. The more channels, formats and contributors there are, the more you have to coordinate, decide, approve and maintain coherence. Friction moves from production to orchestration.
Orchestration, the missing function
Whenever an activity becomes too complex, a new layer of orchestration appears. IT gave us the cloud, then DevOps. Revenue gave us the CRM, then RevOps. Data gave us data platforms, then DataOps.
Creative production is going through the same shift today. Volume, channels, tools and contributors have crossed a threshold. What is missing is a layer that assembles the right teams, structures projects, guarantees quality, provides visibility and takes responsibility for the result.
What this changes for a leader
As long as you think in terms of individual services, you remain the point of coordination. Every project consumes your attention and your team's. You arbitrate, you follow up, you check.
The day you rely on an orchestrated capability, the logic reverses. You formulate an intention, a single owner assembles the setup, steers production and delivers. Your attention returns to where it creates value: strategy, not logistics.
In summary
The corporate creative model is not broken for lack of talent or budget. It is broken because creative work is still organized like an exceptional project, when it has become a permanent activity.
The solution is not one more agency or one more marketplace. It is a system that brings together the best of all three worlds. This is the capability MyJiminy makes available to growing companies. To see what it would look like in your company, let's talk about your needs.
Have a content project in mind?
A MyJ project manager frames your need and builds the team, from brief to delivery.
Talk to an expert →